Brand Comparison
Sesderma vs The History of Whoo
A head-to-head comparison of two popular K-beauty brands. Which one is right for your skin?
Our Pick
The History of Whoo
Higher editor rating (8.8 vs 8.6)
Sesderma
Sesderma is the Valencia-based dermocosmetic house that pioneered mass-pharmacy liposomal skincare. Founded in 1989 by dermatologist Dr. Gabriel Serrano, the brand's signature is its liposomal/nanosome encapsulation technology โ actives carried inside microscopic phospholipid vesicles that protect them from oxidation, deliver them deeper into the epidermis, and reduce the irritation profile of harsher ingredients (vitamin C, glycolic acid, azelaic acid). The visual signature is the tinted serums: C-Vit's orange tint, Acglicolic's distinctive shade โ these aren't dyes, they're the natural colour of the encapsulated molecules. The lineup spans nearly every active class (vitamin C, AHAs, azelaic acid, retinoids, peptides), each in liposomal format. Spanish derms' first-line referral for at-home actives.
Pros
- โ pioneered mass-market liposomal/nanosome encapsulation in dermocosmetics
- โ C-Vit, Acglicolic, and Azelac Ru are category-defining liposomal serums
- โ tinted formulations โ the colour is the active, not added dye
- โ founded by a practising dermatologist โ clinical credibility built in
Cons
- โ liposomal claims often outpace the independent evidence base
- โ the liposomal-everything strategy can muddle which formulations are genuinely innovative
- โ premium pricing for what is still a pharmacy-channel brand
- โ international distribution outside Spain is patchy
The History of Whoo
Price tags that make you wince and packaging that belongs in a palace museum โ but the Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence is legitimately good, and the Gongjinhyang:Seol brightening line has receipts. You're paying for the ritual as much as the results, which is either the point or the problem, depending on who you are.










